The
Ants of Africa SUBFAMILY FORMICINAE Wheeler, 1920: 53 |
Subfamily FORMICINAE Wheeler, 1920: 53Diagnostic Features - Pedicel of a single segment, usually with a narrow connection to the gaster so that the petiole has a distinct posterior face. Eyes usually present. Clypeus developed so that the antennal insertions are some distance behind the anterior margin of the head. Frontal carinae may cover antennal insertions. No sting and apex of gaster with a circular acidopore formed from the hypopigium, this structure often projecting as a nozzle and fringed with hairs. Occasionally the orifice of the acidopore is hidden by a projection of the pygidium, in which case the pronotum, petiole or both are armed with spines. As a whole the Subfamily has been the subject of little in the way of modern revisionary studies. The sole modern generic studies are of Agraulomyrmex (Prins, 1983), a partial revision of Cataglyphis (Agosti, 1990) and of Polyrhachis (Bolton, 1973b). The genus Camponotus has a very large number of species, a vast number of "subspecies", "varieties" and simply code-referenced "forms" and has many members which appear to be abundant, successful and of economic importance. Yet it remains a baffling enigma untackled by contemporary taxonomists. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revised after Bolton (2003: 267) - separating Anoplolepis as previously understood into two separate genera Anoplolepis (in Tribe Lasiini; with Zealleyella as a junior synonym) and Tapinolepis (in Tribe Plagiolepidini; with Mesanoplolepis as a junior synonym). Bolton's prime separation points
are :- In Bolton's separation (2003), however, there are some anomalies which, as he gave no species details or even indication of any review, are questionable. For example Anoplolepis (Anacantholepis) bothae is given as Tapinolepis bothae [queen & male only known]; Anoplolepis (Anoplolepis) macgregori is given as Tapinolepis macgregori; and Anoplolepis (Anoplolepis) pernix is gven as Tapinolepis pernix. Typically, as in others of his generic revisions, Bolton synonymises subgenera and then creates species-groups, in this instance, under Anoplolepis, he wrote of the gracilipes group (being monomorphic) and the custodiens group (polymorphic). LaPolla et al. (2010, link) have examined the phylogeny and taxonomy of what they term "the Prenolepis genus-group". In that they include the genera Euprenolepis, Nylanderia gen. rev., Paraparatrechina gen. rev and stat. nov., Paratrechina, Prenolepis and Pseudolasius. Euprenolepis appears to be restricted to Southeastern Asia and, so, is not covered by this website. Prenolepis they found to include a single species from sub-Saharan Africa (previously Paratrechina kohli). They have transferred the sub-Saharan Pseudolasius species (P. bufonus and P. weissi) to Paraparatrechina. Until they present a full review of the sub-Saharan species, however, I choose not to recognise their species placement. This is because the species I recognise (albeit possibly wrongly) do not separate according to their key to genera. I also have reservations about the basic definition of the type species of Paratrechina Motschoulsky as being Paratrechina longicornis (as a senior synonym of P. currens). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key to Genera known or likely to found in Africa
|
©
2008,
2009, 2010, 2013 - Brian Taylor CBiol FSB FRES 11, Grazingfield, Wilford, Nottingham, NG11 7FN, U.K. |
href="formicinae_2010.htm"